We have enough enemies outside of the industry to deal with this kind of posturing
A meeting was held last week with all 13 parties (including LTO). “We even sat down with his colleague Jeroen van Maanen the day before the accusation of FDF leader Mark van den Oever appeared,” said Kemp. “This reproach – which was also addressed to LTO, NAJK and Netwerk Thorough – greatly undermines the strength of the collaboration, after many have been shamed by FDF in a similar way in recent months. We have enough enemies outside the sector to deal with this kind of posturing, ”says Agractie.
Read more under photo
Bart Kemp from Agraction during a manifestation in Amsterdam last December. – Photo: ANP
Disagreement in LC
According to FDF, clear agreements have been made with the parties not to make statements in the media before 27 May. The action group regrets that ‘various parties’ from the Agricultural Collective (LC) have expressed their vision of the future of the collective in its press release ‘Clear wine’. Four parties (LTO, Agraction, NAJK and Network Thorough) would like to deviate with a different structure, without an independent chairman and with separate consultations with the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality. The name of the LC should also be different, much to the dismay of FDF leader Mark van den Oever. He closes the message for the supporters with a call: “Indicate to your own interest group that the LC should continue to exist in its current form with one sound towards LNV, and not divided as we have been for thirty years. After all, that didn’t bring us anything. ”
Read more under photo
Jeroen van Maanen (FDF) during the action at the Koekamp in The Hague on February 19 this year. – Photo: ANP
Disagreement FDF board
Various media report disagreements within the FDF board. For example, treasurer Daniëlle Hekman would have resigned from displeasure, and board member Jeroen van Maanen would have been blocked or removed from the WhatsApp group. Brabants Dagblad even writes that Van Maanen wants Van den Oever to quit because he is “the biggest danger” for the action group. In a response, Van Maanen informs Boerderij that by no means everything is true of what has been written in the media. “But what is written is written. I can’t say more. I’m not talking about anything at the moment. If the dust cloud has lifted a bit, we will see further. ” Van Maanen indicates that he is prepared to say more about it next week. Foreman Mark van den Oever was not available for a response.
Personal or organizational attacks are absolutely impossible
Agree denounces FDF attacks
Aggression is more than tired of the statements of some FDF board members. “They sharpen everything unnecessarily. Personal or organizational attacks are really impossible, ”says Kemp. Kemp has limited comments on the relationship within the FDF board. “A board member already left around Christmas, and we hear from the media that three have left again. It is up to the survivors to put things in order. ”