The meeting was chaired by Levent GOk TGNA General AssemblyThe arrangement, which was vetoed by President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, stipulated that the installation of filters to 15 thermal power plants would be delayed by 2.5 years.
GOOD Party Group Vice President Contact Lutfu directlysaying the arrangement was defended by AK Party lawmakers during talks at the General Assembly, "he said.We said it all together. Energy is of course important, economy is of course important, but for all this to be important, one has to live. A person whose life has not been realized, ie a dying person, does not need energy or economy at all. Why do we need energy in cemeteries? He only lights the cemetery lamps, nothing else. We couldn't tell you that. You stood up and defended the lack of filters, then applauded when the President vetoed. What about something, what is it? It's impossible to understand, he's committed something strange." said.
CHP'li Ozel: Constitutional right for the first time applied
CHP Group Vice President Contact Ozgur directlyDuring the 5.5-year term of President Erdoğan. veto and that the opposition 's criticism is correct. Special, "We, the President of the veto, 'This group made the wrong orientation, the submission to the thermal power plant lobby, your ministers' job was wrong, you misdirected your group, this last signature is true'".
AK Party Ozkan: We have to think about working life
Responding to criticism of the opposition AK Party Group Deputy Chairman Cahit Ozkan up to 7 years filter There is not even an arrangement about the necessity, said:
"Parliament's power, power, on the other hand, the authority of our President. Of course he will. I will use much more after that. You go to the castle, you become a goalkeeper. 'Leave one side empty and let's have goals from there.' So they mean; 'No separation of powers.' When our President vetoes, different discourses. We serve our nation and our country. On the one hand, we have to think about working life, we will do it. I'm asking, was there such a regulation seven years ago, so that the duration of the extension? If we hadn't made this legal arrangement 7 years ago, the law would have no longer to extend".