"To date the only option for the new stadium is San Siro"


Elliott will not sell Milan. Interviewed by affaritaliani.it, a representative of the fund denied the hypothesis of a sale of the rossonero club after having received the ok from the Commune of Milan for the project on the new stadium with the Inter.

Milan and Inter have assured that there is no Sesto San Giovanni option. Why? What would prevent clubs from going to Milanosesto? It is undoubtedly strange that a few weeks ago the ownership of the enormous project near Milan said it was willing to host the new stadium if the Meazza agreement had not been reached. More: it is not irrelevant that the area of ​​Milanosesto and that of Trotto (the area near San Siro) are of the same fund, or Hines.

"The only option to date on the table is to be able to build a new San Siro at San Siro and on this was based the feasibility proposal and the request made to the Municipality of Milan. The clubs do not have another project elsewhere".

Taken for good the word of the clubs of the non-existence of a Plan B compared to the San Siro, if the city council should reject a new Meazza what would they do? Would San Siro be kept as it is?

"If the city council does not recognize the public interest in the proposal of the clubs, the San Siro option will cease to exist from its first procedural step. Should this situation occur, and only then, will the clubs define subsequent steps, without prejudice to the need to have a stadium in line with the top clubs with which they compete, status quo and restructuring are not viable roads ".

If the city council were to approve and the Superintendency constrain what would be the choice of the clubs? Is there an option to coexist old Meazza, perhaps destined for something else? And if there was a coexistence: who would pay the restructuring costs necessary for securing the current stadium?

"The clubs have made a clear and precise proposal. If you want to say no – even only partially to this question – the clubs will evaluate what to do. Maximum willingness with everyone to improve the project but not to distort it in its fundamentals".

Property issue. The Municipality owns the areas where the stadium is located and the stadium itself, which has been managed by a mixed Milan / Inter company. Whose new stadium would it be? Or rather: in what budget would it end? Among the assets of the Municipality or between the assets of the two companies? Or would it be a 99-year building right which then – as with the subsidized building – is redeemed practically automatically and enters the clubs' balance sheets?

"An initial clarification: today the Meazza stadium is not" managed "by the clubs, but it is given to them as a concession until 2030, with the possibility of cancellation with two years' notice. feasibility for the redevelopment of the San Siro area that the clubs presented to the Municipality of Milan is based on the concession assumption.If the clubs' proposal was definitively approved, after the various steps provided for by the Stadi Law procedure and the Clubs won the public tender to be called by the Municipality, the subject of the report will always be a concession, for which a new agreement must be signed between the teams and the Municipality of Milan.The advanced feasibility proposal hypothesizes a concession, with the establishment of surface rights , for 90 (not 99) years, at the end of which both the stadium and the multifunctional district will be returned to the Municipality in full efficiency and function onalita ".

Is there an option that envisages a new stadium without any kind of construction around it? If not: what are the advantages of the city from building the whole area? What are the public buildings (and therefore owned by the Municipality) that will be built?

"The project presented to the Municipality of Milan envisages both the construction of the stadium and a multifunctional district, as required by the Stadi Law, necessary to ensure economic sustainability and to achieve the goal of redeveloping the entire San Siro area. of the mix of activities can only take place downstream of the public interest and will take place in the procedural dialogue with the institutions ".

Does the Elliott fund plan to put the company up for sale after collecting the ok at the new stadium and building or does it intend to monetize the investment made?

"Absolutely not".

Communication issue: how many of those who responded to the polls of Milan and Inter are from Milan? The fans are not always citizens, and the San Siro is good for the citizens before the fans. Can a geographical breakdown of positive polls be obtained? Which methodology was adopted? What is the champion?

"Users are not registered on the site but interact with the survey as anonymous users. 31% of users who interacted with the survey are from Milan".

Source link



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here