From IBM to Google: They didn't actually succeed in quantum computing


ScienceShorten URL

The response from IBM was not delayed after Google announced that it had achieved quantum superiority. IBM claimed that Google couldn't find anything and its data, which was supposed to be a turning point in quantum computers, wasn't real.

Google's recent article in Nature magazine, the company's "quantum superiority" has been announced that reached. However, according to IBM's quantum computing research team, Google didn't find anything, and quantum superiority was never achieved.
Quantum superiority is the fact that complex processes that can take years in classical computers can be solved much faster in quantum computers. IBM, however, rejected an article on its blog that Google published on Wednesday, a breakthrough in quantum computers. The company claims that Google's quantum superiority is not true, and that the Sycamore quantum processor has not yet passed the classic computers.
Google researchers, within the permissible error thresholds today, the most advanced classic computer can do in 10,000 years, said the quantum computer in just 200 seconds. IBM researchers, however, found the figure exaggerated and claimed that the Summit's supercomputer could effectively do the same in just 2.5 days, using Google performance-enhancing techniques Google that Google didn't consider.

Reactions from the world of science have not been delayed, and scientists find it wrong to insist that Google can now use quantum computers to solve problems with quantum superiority. They also say that quantum computers are long years away and that Google's claim is too artificial and far from practical. On the other hand, it is said that Google's technical success is impressive and that the system offers more than 50 cubes, less than 1 percent error.

Source link



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here